|
|
| Author |
Message |
dick scherrer
Global Moderator
Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Posts: 7517
Location: 221 B Baker St
|
|
|
|
Hello,
| Quote: |
| But if the "code" is a brand-new program, only one load-library should be enough. |
Usually, the concatenations are not chosen per program. The same (standard) "steplib" is typically used for testing. This prevents confusion and sporadic "missing modules". Creating different concatenations or single-library steplibs for various tests should be discouraged if not disallowed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
References
|
 Posted: Fri May 30, 2008 10:01 pm Post subject: Re: |
|
|
|
|
Anuj D.
Senior Member
Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 1706
Location: Mumbai, India
|
|
|
|
Hi Dick,
| dick scherrer wrote: |
| Creating different concatenations or single-library steplibs for various tests should be discouraged if not disallowed. |
This is discouraged at my site as well.
I wanted to make one point clear that one need a single Load module for some program. One might argue that s/he has same program residing in "baseline" & in "development-libraries" as well & so s/he can have two load modules of a single program..! But what if program is new program & was never "base-lined" before, what will be the coding standard then at their site..
For a given moment only one load module is in "use" & if it's new it would be found in the "development-libraries" only, this further stregthen the statement that there is no need of two different load-modules of a single program with different libraries. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
