|
|
| Author |
Message |
tarun_bhardwaj
New User
Joined: 18 Jul 2003
Posts: 30
Location: delhi
|
|
|
|
Hi All,
Iam facing this problem while execting a job:
| Code: |
//STEP1 EXEC PGM=IKJEFT01
// COND=(4,LT)
//DUMMY DD DUMMY
//SYSEXEC DD DSN=&PARMLIB,DISP=SHR,BUFNO=1
//SYSTSIN DD DUMMY
//SYSTSPRT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//OUT03 DD DSN=TAPE.FILE2(+1),
// UNIT=(TAPE,,DEFER),LABEL=(1,SL,EXPDT=99000),
// DISP=(NEW,CATLG,DELETE),
// MGMTCLAS=STANDARD,STORCLAS=BASE,
// RECFM=VB,LRECL=996,AVGREC=K
//OUT08 DD DSN=DASD.FILE1(+1),
// DISP=(NEW,CATLG,DELETE),
// MGMTCLAS=STANDARD,STORCLAS=BASE,
// AVGREC=K,SPACE=(996,(10,20),RLSE),
// RECFM=VB,LRECL=996
//STEP2 EXEC PGM=IDCAMS,
// COND=(4,LT)
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSUT1 DD DSN=TAPE.FILE1(0),
// DISP=SHR
// DD DSN=DASD.FILE1(+1),
// DISP=SHR
// DD DSN=DASD.FILE2(0),
// DISP=SHR
// DD DSN=DASD.FILE3(0),
// DISP=SHR
//SYSUT2 DD DSN=TAPE.FILE2(+1),
// DISP=OLD
|
Here, TAPE.FILE1 is an existing file on the tape with the same allocation parameters as TAPE.FILE2. The files DASD.FILE1, DASD.FILE2 and DASD.FILE3 are files on the disk and DASD.FILE2 and DASD.FILE3 are pre-existing files with allocation parameters same as DASD.FILE1.
I get the following message:
| Code: |
IDCAMS SYSTEM SERVICES T
REPRO INFILE(SYSUT1) OUTFILE(SYSUT2)
IDC3300I ERROR OPENING TAPE.FILE2
IDC3321I ** OPEN/CLOSE/EOV ABEND EXIT TAKEN
IDC0005I NUMBER OF RECORDS PROCESSED WAS 0
IDC3003I FUNCTION TERMINATED. CONDITION CODE IS 12
|
Can someone pls advise me on how to fix this ?
Tarun. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
References
|
|
 |
 Moved: Fri Apr 11, 2008 1:16 pm by superk From JCL to SMS & VSAM |
dick scherrer
Global Moderator
Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Posts: 9185
Location: 221 B Baker St
|
|
|
|
Hello,
Your jcl is confusing to me. . .
In step1 you create a +1 for tape.file. In step2 you use the +1 as sysut2 (typically output)  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
superk
Moderator Team Head
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 3380
Location: Charlotte,NC USA
|
|
|
|
| Tarun, could you also please post the description of the IEC141I 013-34 abend message? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
expat
Global Moderator
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 3725
Location: Brussels once more ...
|
|
|
|
Without too much information, I would guess that this a TMS intervention to prevent the same tape being over written
But as said before - not much info - not much chance of help |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CICS Guy
Senior Member
Joined: 18 Jul 2007
Posts: 1218
Location: At my desk
|
|
|
|
| What is the input for STEP1 and STEP2? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tarun_bhardwaj
New User
Joined: 18 Jul 2003
Posts: 30
Location: delhi
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I got this job working by allocating the tape file in the SYSUT2 step of IDCAMS instead of pre-allocating it. It worked, though i still have no logical reason as to why it shouldn't have worked in the earlier scenario.
Thanks for your inputs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dick scherrer
Global Moderator
Joined: 23 Nov 2006
Posts: 9185
Location: 221 B Baker St
|
|
|
|
Hello,
Are you saying that the file was not written to in the first step, but merely allocated? If so, i believe that may be what caused the 013-34. . .
| Quote: |
| i still have no logical reason as to why it shouldn't have worked in the earlier scenario |
If the above belief is correct, the logical reason if did not work is that while the jcl had no syntax error, the process created an invalid condition with that file. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
