Portal | IBM Manuals | Downloads | Products | Refer | Info | Programs | JCLs | Forum Rules*| Site Map | Mainframe CD 
IBMMAINFRAMES.com - IBM Mainframe Support Forums Index
 
Register
 
IBMMAINFRAMES.com - IBM Mainframe Support Forums Index FAQ Search Memberlist Usergroups Profile Log in to check your private messages Log in
 
1 Records = ? Tracks or ? Cylinders

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    IBMMAINFRAMES.com Support Forums -> Other Mainframe Topics
Author Message
David Beckham

New User


Joined: 04 Apr 2008
Posts: 11
Location: Chennai

PostPosted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 11:02 am    Post subject: 1 Records = ? Tracks or ? Cylinders
Reply with quote

Hi,

I am creating a VSAM dataset with some standard template. In the Define command we are specifying space in terms if RECORDS. Can anyone tell me how to calculate the No of tracks and cylinders from the Records?

Thanks You,
Regards,
David.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
References
PostPosted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 11:02 am    Post subject: Re: 1 Records = ? Tracks or ? Cylinders Reply with quote

Robert Sample

Senior Member


Joined: 06 Jun 2008
Posts: 532
Location: Atlanta, GA

PostPosted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 5:06 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

From the DFSMS AMS for Catalogs manual:
Quote:
If you select RECORDS, the amount of space allocated is the minimum number of tracks that are required to contain the given number of records. The maximum number of records is 16,777,215. If RECORDS is specified for a linear data set, space is allocated with the number of control intervals equal to the number of records.


At a high level: tracks = #records divided by (#records per CI times #CI per track), assuming ESDS or KSDS and not accounting for KSDS index. The CI size is critical to know how much space is being used.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
expat

Global Moderator


Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 3167
Location: Brussels once more ...

PostPosted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 4:23 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Mmmmmmmmmm, not sure if this one still holds true, but once upon a time in a galaxy far far away, if you used RECORDS as the allocation parameter then FSPC was ignored in a cluster definition if specified.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    IBMMAINFRAMES.com Support Forums -> Other Mainframe Topics All times are GMT + 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1