Portal | IBM Manuals | Downloads | Products | Refer | Info | Programs | JCLs | Forum Rules*| Site Map | Mainframe CD 
IBMMAINFRAMES.com - IBM Mainframe Support Forums Index
 
Register
 
IBMMAINFRAMES.com - IBM Mainframe Support Forums Index FAQ Search Memberlist Usergroups Profile Log in to check your private messages Log in
 
moving higher record length variable to lower record length

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    IBMMAINFRAMES.com Support Forums -> Mainframe COBOL
Author Message
kvnkandimalla

New User


Joined: 14 Oct 2005
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2005 7:14 pm    Post subject: moving higher record length variable to lower record length
Reply with quote

hi guys

I got pretty tricky problem.

In production program I have seen moving of higher record length variable to lower record length variable.How it was achieved.That production program is working fine.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
References
Sridevi_C

Active User


Joined: 22 Sep 2005
Posts: 107
Location: Concord, New Hampshire, USA.

PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2005 7:22 pm    Post subject:
Reply with quote

Hi,
Higher record length structure might have got lots of unused fields reserved for future requirements at the bottom and now it's just spaces and so it could be moved to lower length structure.Or they wouldn't mind about the truncation of characters/fields at the end of the higher rec length structure.Let us know the layout of both records and other info,if you are looking for more.
Regards,
Sridevi.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kvnkandimalla

New User


Joined: 14 Oct 2005
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Fri Oct 14, 2005 7:37 pm    Post subject: moving higher record length variable to lower record length
Reply with quote

hi

Thanks for the reply

Take the case.I wouldn't mind for the truncation of characters/fields at the end of the higher rec length structure.when I moved higher record length variable to lower record length variable I have received U4038 when performing RUNJCL.i.e O/S won't allow to truncate.I think there should be other approach
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mmwife

Super Moderator


Joined: 30 May 2003
Posts: 1526

PostPosted: Sun Oct 16, 2005 6:54 am    Post subject:
Reply with quote

What you say shouldn't happen. Perhaps you haven't described the problem correctly.

Why don't you use cut & paste to show us the pgm code (WS & PD) involved anf the system msg(s) involved in the error condition. Then maybe we can offer some intelligent comment.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    IBMMAINFRAMES.com Support Forums -> Mainframe COBOL All times are GMT + 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1