|
|
| Author |
Message |
sibi Yohannan
New User
Joined: 15 Apr 2009
Posts: 46
Location: Bangalore
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I am using the below JCL to get a combined members of Input PDS into a Sequential File.
| Code: |
//STEP09 EXEC PGM=IEBPTPCH
//*
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSUT1 DD DSN=FILEINPUT,
// DISP=SHR
//*
//SYSUT2 DD DSN=FILEOUTPUT,
// DISP=SHR
//SYSIN DD *
PRINT TYPORG=PO,MAXNAME=1,MAXFLDS=1
MEMBER NAME=TEST
/*
// |
the Member name TEST has the below data.
| Code: |
IBM MAINFRAME FORUM IS A WORLD WIDE ACCEPTED FORUM
IBM MAINFRAME FORUM IS A WORLD WIDE ACCEPTED FORUM
IBM MAINFRAME FORUM IS A WORLD WIDE ACCEPTED FORUM
IBM MAINFRAME FORUM IS A WORLD WIDE ACCEPTED FORUM
IBM MAINFRAME FORUM IS A WORLD WIDE ACCEPTED FORUM |
But when I run this step the ouput looks like....
| Code: |
1
MEMBER NAME TEST
IBM MAIN FRAME FO RUM IS A WORLD W IDE ACCE PTED FOR UM*
IBM MAIN FRAME FO RUM IS A WORLD W IDE ACCE PTED FOR UM*
IBM MAIN FRAME FO RUM IS A WORLD W IDE ACCE PTED FOR UM*
IBM MAIN FRAME FO RUM IS A WORLD W IDE ACCE PTED FOR UM* |
Please advice why the data has grouped in the out. There is 2 char space is coming after every 4 chars. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
References
|
|
 |
PeterHolland
Active Member
Joined: 27 Oct 2009
Posts: 531
Location: Netherlands, Amstelveen
|
|
|
|
Add the follwoing control statement :
RECORD FIELD=(80) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
expat
Global Moderator
Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 6469
Location: Brussels once more ...
|
|
|
|
I use PUNCH instead of PRINT
Also, topic moved to IBM tools forum. Hardly a DFSORT issue involved here, is it  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
 Moved: Fri Feb 05, 2010 12:33 pm by expat From DFSORT/ICETOOL to IBM Tools |
sibi Yohannan
New User
Joined: 15 Apr 2009
Posts: 46
Location: Bangalore
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I have tried with that and it is still not working.
I searched in net and I found that addition of the below command
arranges the file in the proper format, But still I am confused with the PREFORM usage.
Please advice. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
deepak040686
New User
Joined: 03 Oct 2008
Posts: 2
Location: chennai
|
|
|
|
You have to mention Record field parameter. Otherwise it will consider the default.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Anuj Dhawan
Global Moderator
Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 4081
Location: Mumbai, India
|
|
|
|
| Sibi- Did you notice what Peter has said in very first response to your question and try to use that? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PeterHolland
Active Member
Joined: 27 Oct 2009
Posts: 531
Location: Netherlands, Amstelveen
|
|
|
|
| Anuj Dhawan wrote: |
| Sibi- Did you notice what Peter has said in very first response to your question and try to use that? |
Anuj,
i discovered some time ago that a lot of people are NOT reading the topic comments.
To be fair it sometimes pisses me off. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Anuj Dhawan
Global Moderator
Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Posts: 4081
Location: Mumbai, India
|
|
|
|
| PeterHolland wrote: |
| i discovered some time ago that a lot of people are NOT reading the topic comments. |
I wonder if they react to the requirement-specifications of some project the same way!?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Robert Sample
Global Moderator
Joined: 06 Jun 2008
Posts: 4258
Location: Atlanta, GA
|
|
|
|
| Quote: |
| I wonder if they react to the requirement-specifications of some project the same way!? |
From some of the questions we see, I don't wonder -- I know they treat requirement specifications the same way! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
